Biblical Essay: Analysis of Pauls Letter To The Galatians

Biblical assay Analysis of Pauls Letter To The Galatians When Paul attended the Jerusalem Conference in 48 or 49, a decisionwas made that gentiles would be allowed to gravel Christians withoutbecoming Jews first (ie. imbibe a circumcision, and follow the Judaic Laws).Paul, organism the one that defended the gentiles right to be Christians,became the apostle to the gentiles. Why would Paul, a Jew, want to be anapostle to gentiles? According to him, Jesus appeared to him in AD 32 or36, and told him to preach the good news to the gentiles (Gal 116). Paul uses al-Quran to explain wherefore gentiles should not be required tobe circumcised, or obey Jewish Law however, there are no direct quotes inscripture that say this. One would wonder why Paul, someone who grew-upin a good Jewish family, would not follow in the footsteps of JewishChristian Missionaries, and require Christian converts to become Jewsfirst. He certainly had to fight to have his belief accepted In myopinion , Paul tried to follow the vitrine of the original apostles (whoknew Jesus) by converting the multitudes. I think Paul understood clementnature better than the other apostles preaching circumcision to thegentiles. Perhaps he horizon that gentiles would accept Christianity moreeasily if it was natural to their lifestyle --Im sure that the sightof circumcision, and strict dietary laws scared gentiles fromChristianity It seems that the Judaziers preached a God that was hardto please. Pauls major(ip) problem confronted in his letter to the Galatians is thepreachings of the Judaziers. Apparently, men who preach circumcision andthe Law had been trying to pervert the Galatians, and change theirbelief... ...is areais full of rules/laws for the Galatians to spicy by. Of course, hejustifies that Christians live by these laws because they Walk in theSpirit of Christ. (Gal 516) If Christians are to accompany Jesusactions & morals, then why should they decide to follow some, and notothers? This is more order of Peter trying to create a convenientreligion. The problem of bankers acceptance of Jewish Law, I believe, is the fundamentalsplit in Christianity. It can up to now be seen today Catholicism representsPauls view of Christianity, while Seventh daylight Adventist Christians keepJewish Law. However, if Paul had preached the Law, I dont believe thatChristianity would even be present today (especially among the gentiles). He did much to advance Christianity however, Gentile Christianity becamea religion of Paul, rather than a religion of Jesus.