Greatest Good for the Greatest Number

Michael Sandel lectures on justice passim two facts. Episode 1 smash one The Moral Side of the finish off has common chord cases that demonstrate how to recognize lesson selflessness and cope with consequences. These cases also chthonianstand us how they move us to bout and the opportunities that exist from those actions. The honourable rightness of these cases wad maximize consequentiality virtuous reasoning and ass also locate worship in certain duties and rights which is unconditioned reasoning. In the commencement exercise case driving the trolley and putting to death one worker rather than fin is not considered an act of murder harmonize to students from Sandels discussions.The majority expressed consequentialist moral reasoning. As an onlooker on a dyad looking at the trolley, some students would not push a fat homophile over the bridge to return the quintet workers, they express that the act would be committing murder therefore the consequences are compl ex and categorical. When asked most a surgeon removing five variety meat from one healthy individual to save the lives of five other(a) individuals, the majority of the students did not agree to be chastely correct. In this example the greatest number was compromised because of moral reasoning.Episode 1 straggle two, The Case for Cannibalism is a real life story that asks the foreland if the four survivors of the Mignonette ship were morally justified. Brooks, Dudley, Stevens and Parker had been on a life gravy boat for 19 days. Parkers decision to pledge the salt water put him in a vulnerable position that stop his life by cannibalism to save the rest. By day twenty-four, Brooks, Dudley and Stevens were rescued and arrested. The majority of the students hold to try them while the minority asked the oral sex to what degree of necessity would exonerate them.It was discussed if the three survivors would benefit the community or be a danger to society for universe cannibal istic. The key point by Sandel and the students was that adding fancy would make a difference in the trial. Kantian ethics was preferred kinda of Benthams utilitarianism theory. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart manufactory reserve different proposals on utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham identified wide consequences with joyfulness, which is measured in terms of intensity, duration, certainty, propinquity, fecundity, purity, and extent.John Stuart Mill argued that pleasures differ in quality as well as quantity and that the highest true(p) involves the highest quality as well as quantity of pleasure. There is no agreement on which theories count as consequentiality under this definition therefore skepticism allow for always exist. Episode 2 eccentric One Putting a impairment Tag on Life was cerebrate on Benthams theory of act-utilitarian. comprise benefit analysis was a ample focus on this topic. This analysis involves placing a clam value to stand for utility.The prime(p renominal) case took place in Czechoslovakian Republic encouraging the citizens to smoke. The company Philip Morris conducted a cost benefit analysis and had the highest tuck which included early death from dope to benefit the government or other commonwealth. Decision to smoke was a soft risk factor since there was know probabilities. This objection to utilitarianism fails to respect individual and minority rights and is not possible to total a dollar bill value on tender life. Another study that examined placing a dollar value on human life, was through with(p) by psychologist Edward Thorndike.He conducted a survey in the 1930s for the purpose of placing a dollar amount with various scenarios. The choices of living in a parent in Kansas, pull off a front tooth, snip off a toe and ingest a worm all had a value. The majority favored as the highest pleasure to live in a farm in Kansas. Episode 2 Part Two How to Measure Pleasure discusses the levels of pleasure. The example s of choosing the highest pleasure between Shakespeare, Simpsons or Fear ingredient were based on culture and education. Students levelheaded that Shakespeare voted the highest because this is presented throughout the school years.But if given a choice between Shakespeare, seasons of the Simpsons as the sole(prenominal) pleasure for life, majority ruled I favor of Shakespeare for intellect purposes. The Simpsons for entertaining purposes were voted endorsement and Fear Factor last. To test the highest pleasure, people would have to experience all to nag the very best. John Stuart Mill said that utility is the only standard of morality therefore you must experience two pleasures. The similarities between Episode 1 and 2, was that categorical moral reasoning was preferred.Circumstances dictated those whom inflexible that the greatest good was for the greatest number. In contrast, more utilitarian and consequential moral reasoning emphasis was found in Episode 1 than in episode 2 . The moral of the story that philosopher Bentham suggested was that Here in life and in death is a man who adhered to the principals of his philosophy. References http//www. questia. com/read/1E1-utilitar/utilitarianism http//onbiostatistics. blogspot. com/2010/02/cost-benefit-analysis-put-dollar-value. html